From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935884AbcHBRcQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:32:16 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:38516 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932379AbcHBLok (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 07:44:40 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,460,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="1018197314" From: Baole Ni To: mchehab@kernel.org, maurochehab@gmail.com, mchehab@infradead.org, mchehab@redhat.com, m.chehab@samsung.com, crope@iki.fi, hal.rosenstock@gmail.com, bp@alien8.de Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr, hans.verkuil@cisco.com, chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com, standby24x7@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH 0388/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:06:52 +0800 Message-Id: <20160802110652.7645-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu Signed-off-by: Baole Ni --- drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv6110x.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv6110x.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv6110x.c index a62c01e..69719c7 100644 --- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv6110x.c +++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv6110x.c @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ #define MAX_XFER_SIZE 64 static unsigned int verbose; -module_param(verbose, int, 0644); +module_param(verbose, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(verbose, "Set Verbosity level"); static int stv6110x_read_reg(struct stv6110x_state *stv6110x, u8 reg, u8 *data) -- 2.9.2