From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756543AbcHBLsw (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 07:48:52 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:4810 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756514AbcHBLsl (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 07:48:41 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,460,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="743073922" From: Baole Ni To: mchehab@kernel.org, maurochehab@gmail.com, mchehab@infradead.org, mchehab@redhat.com, m.chehab@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, a.hajda@samsung.com, bp@alien8.de Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com Subject: [PATCH 0427/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:10:45 +0800 Message-Id: <20160802111045.10289-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu Signed-off-by: Baole Ni --- drivers/media/i2c/sr030pc30.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/sr030pc30.c b/drivers/media/i2c/sr030pc30.c index 0bf031b..d0e45a6 100644 --- a/drivers/media/i2c/sr030pc30.c +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/sr030pc30.c @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ #include static int debug; -module_param(debug, int, 0644); +module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); #define MODULE_NAME "SR030PC30" -- 2.9.2