From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
To: mchehab@kernel.org, maurochehab@gmail.com, mchehab@infradead.org,
mchehab@redhat.com, m.chehab@samsung.com, mkrufky@linuxtv.org,
s.nawrocki@samsung.com, kgene@kernel.org,
k.kozlowski@samsung.com
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 0619/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:30:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160802113031.23318-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> (raw)
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
---
drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c b/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c
index e397f54..4043224 100644
--- a/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c
+++ b/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c
@@ -44,24 +44,24 @@
#define DRIVER_NAME "em28xx"
static int tuner = -1;
-module_param(tuner, int, 0444);
+module_param(tuner, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(tuner, "tuner type");
static unsigned int disable_ir;
-module_param(disable_ir, int, 0444);
+module_param(disable_ir, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(disable_ir, "disable infrared remote support");
static unsigned int disable_usb_speed_check;
-module_param(disable_usb_speed_check, int, 0444);
+module_param(disable_usb_speed_check, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(disable_usb_speed_check,
"override min bandwidth requirement of 480M bps");
static unsigned int card[] = {[0 ... (EM28XX_MAXBOARDS - 1)] = -1U };
-module_param_array(card, int, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(card, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(card, "card type");
static int usb_xfer_mode = -1;
-module_param(usb_xfer_mode, int, 0444);
+module_param(usb_xfer_mode, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(usb_xfer_mode,
"USB transfer mode for frame data (-1 = auto, 0 = prefer isoc, 1 = prefer bulk)");
--
2.9.2
reply other threads:[~2016-08-02 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160802113031.23318-1-baolex.ni@intel.com \
--to=baolex.ni@intel.com \
--cc=chuansheng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
--cc=maurochehab@gmail.com \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=mkrufky@linuxtv.org \
--cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®