From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934993AbcHBPsj (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 11:48:39 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:63323 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934475AbcHBMWX (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:22:23 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,460,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="1018217235" From: Baole Ni To: inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com, linux-wimax@intel.com, bkenward@solarflare.com, linux-driver@qlogic.com, computersforpeace@gmail.com, m.chehab@samsung.com, pawel@osciak.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, k.kozlowski@samsung.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com, tgraf@suug.ch, hannes@stressinduktion.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, pabeni@redhat.com Subject: [PATCH 0761/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:43:42 +0800 Message-Id: <20160802114342.394-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu Signed-off-by: Baole Ni --- drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/rx.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/rx.c b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/rx.c index 0b60295..29a2dbb 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/rx.c +++ b/drivers/net/wimax/i2400m/rx.c @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ #include "debug-levels.h" static int i2400m_rx_reorder_disabled; /* 0 (rx reorder enabled) by default */ -module_param_named(rx_reorder_disabled, i2400m_rx_reorder_disabled, int, 0644); +module_param_named(rx_reorder_disabled, i2400m_rx_reorder_disabled, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(rx_reorder_disabled, "If true, RX reordering will be disabled."); -- 2.9.2