From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966689AbcHBPTo (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 11:19:44 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:46508 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964993AbcHBMet (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:34:49 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,460,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="1028277887" From: Baole Ni To: mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, pali.rohar@gmail.com, dvhart@infradead.org, jgross@suse.com, bhelgaas@google.com, m.chehab@samsung.com, pawel@osciak.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, k.kozlowski@samsung.com Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com Subject: [PATCH 0847/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:52:04 +0800 Message-Id: <20160802115204.6456-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu Signed-off-by: Baole Ni --- drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c index 2c2f02b..11ecf538 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static struct rfkill *bluetooth_rfkill; static struct rfkill *wwan_rfkill; static bool force_rfkill; -module_param(force_rfkill, bool, 0444); +module_param(force_rfkill, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(force_rfkill, "enable rfkill on non whitelisted models"); static const struct dmi_system_id dell_device_table[] __initconst = { -- 2.9.2