From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967765AbcHBQFi (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 12:05:38 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:48468 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934027AbcHBMSG (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:18:06 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:58:50 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Andrew Morton , Dave Anderson , Ingo Molnar , "Paul E. McKenney" , Wang Shu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] introduce for_each_process_thread_{break,continue}() helpers Message-ID: <20160802115850.GI6862@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20160725162332.GA23935@redhat.com> <20160725162348.GA23947@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160725162348.GA23947@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 06:23:48PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > +void for_each_process_thread_continue(struct task_struct **p_leader, > + struct task_struct **p_thread) > +{ > + struct task_struct *leader = *p_leader, *thread = *p_thread; > + struct task_struct *prev, *next; > + u64 start_time; > + > + if (pid_alive(thread)) { > + /* mt exec could change the leader */ > + *p_leader = thread->group_leader; > + } else if (pid_alive(leader)) { > + start_time = thread->start_time; > + prev = leader; > + > + for_each_thread(leader, next) { > + if (next->start_time > start_time) > + break; > + prev = next; > + } This, > + *p_thread = prev; > + } else { > + start_time = leader->start_time; > + prev = &init_task; > + > + for_each_process(next) { > + if (next->start_time > start_time) > + break; > + prev = next; > + } and this, could be 'SPEND_TOO_MUCH_TIME' all by themselves. Unlikely though, nor do I really have a better suggestion :/ > + > + *p_leader = prev; > + /* a new thread can come after that, but this is fine */ > + *p_thread = list_last_entry(&prev->signal->thread_head, > + struct task_struct, > + thread_node); > + } > + > + put_task_struct(leader); > + put_task_struct(thread); > +}