From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965402AbcHBMrC (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:47:02 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:15901 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965346AbcHBMp6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:45:58 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,460,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="149326519" From: Baole Ni To: tomi.valkeinen@ti.com, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, m.chehab@samsung.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, k.kozlowski@samsung.com Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robdclark@gmail.com, airlied@gmail.com, peter.ujfalusi@ti.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com, oneukum@suse.com Subject: [PATCH 1012/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:08:11 +0800 Message-Id: <20160802120811.17558-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu Signed-off-by: Baole Ni --- drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c index d63e598..f3711a7 100644 --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id dsi_of_match[]; #ifdef DSI_PERF_MEASURE static bool dsi_perf; -module_param(dsi_perf, bool, 0644); +module_param(dsi_perf, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); #endif static inline struct dsi_data *dsi_get_dsidrv_data(struct platform_device *dsidev) -- 2.9.2