From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966088AbcHBNBb (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:01:31 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:5147 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965876AbcHBNA7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:00:59 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,460,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="1006975386" From: Baole Ni To: perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, serge@hallyn.com, davem@davemloft.net, kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, k.kozlowski@samsung.com Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com, aryabinin@virtuozzo.com Subject: [PATCH 1172/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:23:05 +0800 Message-Id: <20160802122305.28286-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu Signed-off-by: Baole Ni --- sound/isa/ad1848/ad1848.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/isa/ad1848/ad1848.c b/sound/isa/ad1848/ad1848.c index f159da4e..3943d18 100644 --- a/sound/isa/ad1848/ad1848.c +++ b/sound/isa/ad1848/ad1848.c @@ -49,19 +49,19 @@ static int irq[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_IRQ; /* 5,7,9,11,12,15 */ static int dma1[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_DMA; /* 0,1,3,5,6,7 */ static bool thinkpad[SNDRV_CARDS]; /* Thinkpad special case */ -module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "Index value for " CRD_NAME " soundcard."); -module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string for " CRD_NAME " soundcard."); -module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Enable " CRD_NAME " soundcard."); -module_param_array(port, long, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(port, long, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(port, "Port # for " CRD_NAME " driver."); -module_param_array(irq, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(irq, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(irq, "IRQ # for " CRD_NAME " driver."); -module_param_array(dma1, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(dma1, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(dma1, "DMA1 # for " CRD_NAME " driver."); -module_param_array(thinkpad, bool, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(thinkpad, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(thinkpad, "Enable only for the onboard CS4248 of IBM Thinkpad 360/750/755 series."); static int snd_ad1848_match(struct device *dev, unsigned int n) -- 2.9.2