From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966154AbcHBNDX (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:03:23 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:3540 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935179AbcHBNCx (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:02:53 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,460,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="1033612291" From: Baole Ni To: perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, serge@hallyn.com, davem@davemloft.net, kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, k.kozlowski@samsung.com Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com, aryabinin@virtuozzo.com Subject: [PATCH 1178/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:23:45 +0800 Message-Id: <20160802122345.28694-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu Signed-off-by: Baole Ni --- sound/isa/cs423x/cs4231.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/isa/cs423x/cs4231.c b/sound/isa/cs423x/cs4231.c index 282cd75..ab89e9f 100644 --- a/sound/isa/cs423x/cs4231.c +++ b/sound/isa/cs423x/cs4231.c @@ -49,23 +49,23 @@ static int mpu_irq[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_IRQ; /* 9,11,12,15 */ static int dma1[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_DMA; /* 0,1,3,5,6,7 */ static int dma2[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_DMA; /* 0,1,3,5,6,7 */ -module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "Index value for " CRD_NAME " soundcard."); -module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string for " CRD_NAME " soundcard."); -module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Enable " CRD_NAME " soundcard."); -module_param_array(port, long, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(port, long, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(port, "Port # for " CRD_NAME " driver."); -module_param_array(mpu_port, long, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(mpu_port, long, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(mpu_port, "MPU-401 port # for " CRD_NAME " driver."); -module_param_array(irq, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(irq, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(irq, "IRQ # for " CRD_NAME " driver."); -module_param_array(mpu_irq, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(mpu_irq, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(mpu_irq, "MPU-401 IRQ # for " CRD_NAME " driver."); -module_param_array(dma1, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(dma1, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(dma1, "DMA1 # for " CRD_NAME " driver."); -module_param_array(dma2, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(dma2, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(dma2, "DMA2 # for " CRD_NAME " driver."); static int snd_cs4231_match(struct device *dev, unsigned int n) -- 2.9.2