From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966218AbcHBNDu (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:03:50 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:60215 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935173AbcHBNCx (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:02:53 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,460,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="1006976093" From: Baole Ni To: perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, serge@hallyn.com, davem@davemloft.net, kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, k.kozlowski@samsung.com Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com, aryabinin@virtuozzo.com Subject: [PATCH 1180/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:23:57 +0800 Message-Id: <20160802122357.28830-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu Signed-off-by: Baole Ni --- sound/isa/es1688/es1688.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/isa/es1688/es1688.c b/sound/isa/es1688/es1688.c index 1901c2b..e45e077 100644 --- a/sound/isa/es1688/es1688.c +++ b/sound/isa/es1688/es1688.c @@ -61,27 +61,27 @@ static int irq[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_IRQ; /* 5,7,9,10 */ static int mpu_irq[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_IRQ; /* 5,7,9,10 */ static int dma8[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_DMA; /* 0,1,3 */ -module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "Index value for " CRD_NAME " soundcard."); -module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string for " CRD_NAME " soundcard."); -module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); #ifdef CONFIG_PNP -module_param_array(isapnp, bool, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(isapnp, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(isapnp, "PnP detection for specified soundcard."); #endif MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Enable " CRD_NAME " soundcard."); -module_param_array(port, long, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(port, long, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(port, "Port # for " CRD_NAME " driver."); -module_param_array(mpu_port, long, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(mpu_port, long, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(mpu_port, "MPU-401 port # for " CRD_NAME " driver."); -module_param_array(irq, int, NULL, 0444); -module_param_array(fm_port, long, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(irq, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); +module_param_array(fm_port, long, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(fm_port, "FM port # for ES1688 driver."); MODULE_PARM_DESC(irq, "IRQ # for " CRD_NAME " driver."); -module_param_array(mpu_irq, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(mpu_irq, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(mpu_irq, "MPU-401 IRQ # for " CRD_NAME " driver."); -module_param_array(dma8, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(dma8, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(dma8, "8-bit DMA # for " CRD_NAME " driver."); #ifdef CONFIG_PNP -- 2.9.2