From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965518AbcHBNJ5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:09:57 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:10243 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966182AbcHBNJF (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:09:05 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,460,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="1033616647" From: Baole Ni To: perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com, gnurou@gmail.com, kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, davem@davemloft.net, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, k.kozlowski@samsung.com Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lars@metafoo.de, chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com, aryabinin@virtuozzo.com Subject: [PATCH 1240/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:30:14 +0800 Message-Id: <20160802123014.517-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu Signed-off-by: Baole Ni --- sound/pci/lx6464es/lx6464es.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/pci/lx6464es/lx6464es.c b/sound/pci/lx6464es/lx6464es.c index 8b8e2e5..b640978 100644 --- a/sound/pci/lx6464es/lx6464es.c +++ b/sound/pci/lx6464es/lx6464es.c @@ -44,11 +44,11 @@ static int index[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_IDX; static char *id[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_STR; static bool enable[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_ENABLE_PNP; -module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "Index value for Digigram LX6464ES interface."); -module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string for Digigram LX6464ES interface."); -module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Enable/disable specific Digigram LX6464ES soundcards."); static const char card_name[] = "LX6464ES"; -- 2.9.2