From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966657AbcHBNm6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:42:58 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:50741 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966184AbcHBNJF (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:09:05 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,460,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="858167504" From: Baole Ni To: clemens@ladisch.de, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com, gnurou@gmail.com, kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, davem@davemloft.net, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, k.kozlowski@samsung.com Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com, baolex.ni@intel.com, aryabinin@virtuozzo.com Subject: [PATCH 1245/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:30:43 +0800 Message-Id: <20160802123043.854-1-baolex.ni@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu Signed-off-by: Baole Ni --- sound/pci/oxygen/se6x.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/pci/oxygen/se6x.c b/sound/pci/oxygen/se6x.c index f70d514..e27bcef 100644 --- a/sound/pci/oxygen/se6x.c +++ b/sound/pci/oxygen/se6x.c @@ -45,11 +45,11 @@ static int index[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_IDX; static char *id[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_STR; static bool enable[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_ENABLE_PNP; -module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "card index"); -module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string"); -module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444); +module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "enable card"); static const struct pci_device_id se6x_ids[] = { -- 2.9.2