From: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com,
srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uprobe: Add uprobe_pre/post_sstep_notifier to NOKPROBE_SYMBOL
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:54:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160803042454.GB18785@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160803004524.760a8398c7525852bf26a29d@kernel.org>
Hi Masami,
On 03/08/2016:12:45:24 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 12:14:06 +0530
> Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier and uprobe_post_sstep_notifier are called from
> > debug exception handler, so blacklist them for kprobing.
>
> Actually, these exception notifers are kicked only if the debug exception
> is not related to kprobes (at least on x86). In that case, we don't have
> to take care about that. Or, would you hit any problem on it?
Well, I have faced issue on ARM64. So, if I have a kprobe instrumented at these
functions and then if I hit a uprobe then kernel goes into an infinite loop of
"Unexpected kernel single-step exception at EL1".
On x86 I have not tested, but I see that all functions except
arch_uprobe_exception_notify() in the call stack of
uprobe_pre/post_sstep_notifier() are blacklisted for kprobe. So, I am unable to
understand that why arch_uprobe_exception_notify() and
uprobe_pre/post_sstep_notifier() are not blacklisted.
>
> IOW, where do we have to prohibit kprobes are, the code path from where
> right after the breakpoint (debug) exception is occurred, to where right
> before the kprobe is handled. After that, it should be safe.
Hummmm...My understanding was that if a function a() is not good to be kprobed
then we can not kprobe any function called by a() as well. Thanks for the
clarification. So, if I go with your definition then, something is still wrong on
ARM64 which is causing issue when I kprobe uprobe_pre/post_sstep_notifier().
~Pratyush
>
> Thank you,
>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/events/uprobes.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> > index b7a525ab2083..206e594cb65e 100644
> > --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> > +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
> > #include <linux/percpu-rwsem.h>
> > #include <linux/task_work.h>
> > #include <linux/shmem_fs.h>
> > +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
> >
> > #include <linux/uprobes.h>
> >
> > @@ -1997,6 +1998,7 @@ int uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > set_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE);
> > return 1;
> > }
> > +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier);
> >
> > /*
> > * uprobe_post_sstep_notifier gets called in interrupt context as part of notifier
> > @@ -2014,6 +2016,7 @@ int uprobe_post_sstep_notifier(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > set_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE);
> > return 1;
> > }
> > +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(uprobe_post_sstep_notifier);
> >
> > static struct notifier_block uprobe_exception_nb = {
> > .notifier_call = arch_uprobe_exception_notify,
> > --
> > 2.5.5
> >
>
>
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-03 4:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-02 6:44 Pratyush Anand
2016-08-02 15:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-08-03 4:24 ` Pratyush Anand [this message]
2016-08-03 10:35 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-08-03 14:31 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-08-02 20:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-08-03 4:12 ` Pratyush Anand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160803042454.GB18785@localhost.localdomain \
--to=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®