From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Carlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com>,
Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v3] drm: bridge/dw-hdmi: Move edid reading to .detect() callback
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 10:06:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160805080608.GZ6232@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160804230125.GZ1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:01:25AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 06:13:18PM +0100, Jose Abreu wrote:
> > Hi Russell,
> >
> > So, I didn't use framebuffer console but used X instead and it is
> > working as it should. I think we can drop this patch. I am now
> > making interoperability with DVI and I am facing the following
> > scenario:
> > - I start the driver
> > - An EDID is sent which tells the driver that HDMI is NOT
> > supported;
> > - The driver configures itself to a DVI mode;
> >
> > Until this point everything is working as it should. But:
> >
> > - Now I send an EDID which tells the driver that HDMI is
> > supported;
> > - As the EDID has the same preferred mode the user will not
> > reconfigure the mode and there will be no change to HDMI mode.
>
> The EDID should still be read, but as you say, userspace doesn't take
> any action because it sees that the mode parameters are still the same,
> as you have identified.
>
> > The missing change to HDMI mode will cause the test to fail. The
> > workaround that I am using is to reconfigure to another video
> > mode and then configure to the preferred one but I think this
> > could be fixed in the driver, right?
>
> This one is extremely awkward - to fix it, we would need to check to
> see whether we reconfigure the hardware each time we read the EDID,
> and I don't think that's a particularly nice thing to do.
>
> I'd like to hear what other DRM developers think about this issue.
I pondored whether we should have a counter on each connector for probe
state, which helpers would increment whenever something changes, like:
- connector_status (as tracked by probe helpers)
- anything in the edid changes (when setting it
drm_mode_connector_update_edid_property)
- other changes (like sink state changes in dpcd or whatever)
That way userspace would be able to reliably spot such changes and do a
new modeset.
The other side of this is making sure that the kernel doesn't optimize
away a modeset in this case. The problem is that current helpers (both
legacy and atomic) only look at the output routing and the display mode
and nothing else to decide whether a full modeset is required. At least
with atomic that's easy to fix:
- When the connector state changes we simply need to set the
connectors_changed boolean in the corresponding CRTC state.
- We can use the probe lifecycle counter from above to do that: If it's
changed in atomic_check, then we set connectors_changed to force a full
modeset.
I guess with just the kernel changes (and not even upgrading userspace)
we'd probably fix many cases already.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-05 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-04 10:44 [PATCH 0/3 v3] drm: bridge/dw-hdmi: Fixes for dw-hdmi and DWC support Jose Abreu
2016-08-04 10:44 ` [PATCH 1/3 v3] drm: bridge/dw-hdmi: Add support for DWC Phy Jose Abreu
2016-08-04 10:44 ` [PATCH 2/3 v3] drm: bridge/dw-hdmi: Enable ISCR1, ISCR2 and ACP packets Jose Abreu
2016-08-04 15:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-08-04 16:18 ` Jose Abreu
2016-08-04 10:44 ` [PATCH 3/3 v3] drm: bridge/dw-hdmi: Move edid reading to .detect() callback Jose Abreu
2016-08-04 10:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-08-04 13:58 ` Jose Abreu
2016-08-04 14:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-08-04 14:57 ` Jose Abreu
2016-08-04 15:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-08-04 17:13 ` Jose Abreu
2016-08-04 23:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-08-05 8:06 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2016-08-05 8:13 ` Chris Wilson
2016-08-08 16:25 ` Jose Abreu
2016-08-09 6:09 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160805080608.GZ6232@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com \
--cc=Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=architt@codeaurora.org \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome