From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] locking/mutex: Ensure forward progress of waiter-spinner
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:28:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201608110934.HlRyLTo3%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470853530-37540-4-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3837 bytes --]
Hi Waiman,
[auto build test ERROR on tip/locking/core]
[also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc1]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Waiman-Long/locking-mutex-Enable-optimistic-spinning-of-lock-waiter/20160811-074736
config: arm-sunxi_defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 5.4.0-6) 5.4.0 20160609
reproduce:
wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=arm
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/linux/compiler.h:58:0,
from include/uapi/linux/stddef.h:1,
from include/linux/stddef.h:4,
from include/uapi/linux/posix_types.h:4,
from include/uapi/linux/types.h:13,
from include/linux/types.h:5,
from include/linux/thread_info.h:10,
from include/asm-generic/current.h:4,
from ./arch/arm/include/generated/asm/current.h:1,
from include/linux/mutex.h:13,
from kernel/locking/mutex.c:20:
kernel/locking/mutex.c: In function 'mutex_optimistic_spin':
>> include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:15:19: error: expected expression before '__asm__'
#define barrier() __asm__ __volatile__("": : :"memory")
^
>> arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h:82:23: note: in expansion of macro 'barrier'
#define cpu_relax() barrier()
^
>> arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h:85:47: note: in expansion of macro 'cpu_relax'
#define cpu_relax_lowlatency() cpu_relax()
^
>> kernel/locking/mutex.c:355:10: note: in expansion of macro 'cpu_relax_lowlatency'
for (;; cpu_relax_lowlatency()) {
^
vim +/cpu_relax +85 arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h
^1da177e4 include/asm-arm/processor.h Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 76
^1da177e4 include/asm-arm/processor.h Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 77 unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p);
^1da177e4 include/asm-arm/processor.h Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 78
5dab26af1 arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h Will Deacon 2011-03-04 79 #if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ == 6 || defined(CONFIG_ARM_ERRATA_754327)
534be1d5a arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h Will Deacon 2010-06-21 80 #define cpu_relax() smp_mb()
534be1d5a arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h Will Deacon 2010-06-21 81 #else
^1da177e4 include/asm-arm/processor.h Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 @82 #define cpu_relax() barrier()
534be1d5a arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h Will Deacon 2010-06-21 83 #endif
^1da177e4 include/asm-arm/processor.h Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 84
3a6bfbc91 arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h Davidlohr Bueso 2014-06-29 @85 #define cpu_relax_lowlatency() cpu_relax()
3a6bfbc91 arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h Davidlohr Bueso 2014-06-29 86
815d5ec86 include/asm-arm/processor.h Al Viro 2006-01-12 87 #define task_pt_regs(p) \
32d39a935 include/asm-arm/processor.h Al Viro 2006-01-12 88 ((struct pt_regs *)(THREAD_START_SP + task_stack_page(p)) - 1)
:::::: The code at line 85 was first introduced by commit
:::::: 3a6bfbc91df04b081a44d419e0260bad54abddf7 arch, locking: Ciao arch_mutex_cpu_relax()
:::::: TO: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
:::::: CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 20003 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-11 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-10 18:25 [PATCH v5 0/3] locking/mutex: Enable optimistic spinning of lock waiter Waiman Long
2016-08-10 18:25 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] locking/mutex: Add waiter parameter to mutex_optimistic_spin() Waiman Long
2016-08-10 18:25 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] locking/mutex: Enable optimistic spinning of woken task in wait queue Waiman Long
2016-08-10 18:25 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] locking/mutex: Ensure forward progress of waiter-spinner Waiman Long
2016-08-11 1:18 ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-11 1:28 ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2016-08-11 2:00 ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-11 15:01 ` Waiman Long
2016-08-18 15:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-18 16:52 ` Imre Deak
2016-08-18 18:04 ` Jason Low
2016-08-18 19:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201608110934.HlRyLTo3%fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=jason.low2@hpe.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®