From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752578AbcHLJyh (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2016 05:54:37 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:38974 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751340AbcHLJxn (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2016 05:53:43 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 10:53:17 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Pierre-Louis Bossart Cc: Laura Abbott , Jie Yang , Takashi Iwai , Vinod Koul , Liam Girdwood , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Message-ID: <20160812095317.GZ9347@sirena.org.uk> References: <88774f89-ce4a-1877-db49-b018d725f1cd@redhat.com> <3a548725-5b52-4b3e-457a-f6ca93645b15@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HSHpc5A+GJc9BHcd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3a548725-5b52-4b3e-457a-f6ca93645b15@linux.intel.com> X-Cookie: I can't drive 55. User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:348:6:8808:fab::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: Correct modules for Bay Trail MAX98090 soc? X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk); Unknown failure Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --HSHpc5A+GJc9BHcd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 06:31:27PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > On 8/11/16 3:42 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: > > which changed the dependencies for CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_BYT_MAX98090_MACH. > > The set of options Fedora selects means that > > CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_BYT_MAX98090_MACH > > can't be selected. Is there another driver that's supposed to replace > > CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_BYT_MAX98090_MACH on Bay Trail or do the dependencies > > need to be updated? The bugzilla has alsa-info for working and non- > > working cases and the Fedora config is attached. > If you remove support for all other baytrail options this driver should > still be there and selectable. We just can't support both this driver for > Chromebooks and the rest for other machines with the same distribution at > the moment. That sounds like a regression, what's the plan to fix it. --HSHpc5A+GJc9BHcd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXrZyLAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQR4wH/0kqSPi5qxvinsjpERNwNG2T c/j5LwUgYwbWHSiqTo8HJPZ2nc259F61zfld8N0eheU6u/nEGEe8HOpkHvsm/+wa lO0P0lY1NoLI82C1wWZSBKzXxuAJuVMYiL9+TOH1VN1T4b1iTHtbfGikxyyn8slr WafJe3DC9zlkhL+21H4jiJbpZmKAdYmtv8MRW5066NinLZjR776ZgeYCUptpHkZO pE5VkuM4fGa3GrxvT7f95VUVpbngoXwW8ZHH3Jy5t+oANOcJmTbICCS+S/By3pnH l9fRrNRtfp429dzfBGl74CPGGAweIjCW9bDT/QRvZX7/ZRer5n62lNcWyvmg72w= =k2Zw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HSHpc5A+GJc9BHcd--