From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753748AbcHPQLB (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:11:01 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:36094 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753446AbcHPQKE (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:10:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:09:59 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao Cc: "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "f.fainelli@gmail.com" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , Michal Simek , Soren Brinkmann , Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri , David Miller , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 3/3] net: phy: Add gmiitorgmii converter support Message-ID: <20160816160959.GO14446@lunn.ch> References: <1470735283-23611-1-git-send-email-appanad@xilinx.com> <1470735283-23611-4-git-send-email-appanad@xilinx.com> <20160815213059.GK24664@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > https://github.com/lunn/linux/commit/03d375489ceb56e171056f44d0fe9c34ca > > 5a098e > > > > Notice the > > > > Not-Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn > > > > and the Copyright i added? > > > > In various emails i gave you the basic idea how this should be done, a framework > > of code, and then took your code which did not even compile and made the core > > of it work. This is as much my code as your code, so i expect my Copyright to be > > kept on this code. And since this is my code, i need to give a Signed-off-by, > > which i was not yet ready to give since the code was not complete or working. > > > > Please put both my Copyright back and Not-Signed-Off-by back and post the > > next version as RFC. Once i'm happy this code is O.K, i will give you a Signed-off- > > by. > > Sorry I should have been included your copyright. > > I missed it... > I didn't included your SOF because. > AFAIK without explicit permission of the other person we shouldn't include SOF. > That's why I didn't included your SOF and thanked for your efforts after SOF. > Sorry if my understanding is wrong. Without a SOB you cannot submit the patch for inclusion at all. You should however reproduce tags which have been given, i.e. you should of kept my Not-Signed-Off-by: making it clear i have not yet given permission for this code to go into mainline. Andrew