From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1758687AbcHYHju (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 25 Aug 2016 03:39:50 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:33590 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1758657AbcHYHjp (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 25 Aug 2016 03:39:45 -0400
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:11:04 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
        Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@gmail.com>,
        Ralf-Peter Rohbeck <Ralf-Peter.Rohbeck@quantum.com>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>, Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: OOM detection regressions since 4.7
Message-ID: <20160825071103.GC4230@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <20160822093249.GA14916@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20160822093707.GG13596@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20160822100528.GB11890@kroah.com>
 <20160822105441.GH13596@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20160822133114.GA15302@kroah.com>
 <20160822134227.GM13596@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20160822150517.62dc7cce74f1af6c1f204549@linux-foundation.org>
 <20160823074339.GB23577@dhcp22.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160823074339.GB23577@dhcp22.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue 23-08-16 09:43:39, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 22-08-16 15:05:17, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:42:28 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Of course, if Linus/Andrew doesn't like to take those compaction
> > > improvements this late then I will ask to merge the partial revert to
> > > Linus tree as well and then there is not much to discuss.
> > 
> > This sounds like the prudent option.  Can we get 4.8 working
> > well-enough, backport that into 4.7.x and worry about the fancier stuff
> > for 4.9?
> 
> OK, fair enough.
> 
> I would really appreciate if the original reporters could retest with
> this patch on top of the current Linus tree.

Any luck with the testing of this patch?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs