mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] sched/wait: avoid abort_exclusive_wait() in __wait_on_bit_lock()
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:45:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160826124552.GB28904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160826124453.GA28894@redhat.com>

I think it would be nice to kill abort_exclusive_wait(). This patch
changes __wait_on_bit_lock(), but we can do a similar change to remove
it from ___wait_event().

We do not need anything tricky to avoid the race, we can just call
finish_wait() if action() fails. test_and_set_bit() implies mb() so
the lockless list_empty_careful() case is fine, we can not miss the
condition if we race with unlock_page().

I am not sure we even want to conditionalize both finish_wait()'s,
we could simply call it unconditionally and once before test_and_set(),
the spurious wakeup is unlikely case.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/sched/wait.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/wait.c b/kernel/sched/wait.c
index 2bbba01..c10e904 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/wait.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/wait.c
@@ -423,20 +423,28 @@ int __sched
 __wait_on_bit_lock(wait_queue_head_t *wq, struct wait_bit_queue *q,
 			wait_bit_action_f *action, unsigned mode)
 {
-	do {
-		int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
+	for (;;) {
 		prepare_to_wait_exclusive(wq, &q->wait, mode);
-		if (!test_bit(q->key.bit_nr, q->key.flags))
-			continue;
-		ret = action(&q->key, mode);
-		if (!ret)
-			continue;
-		abort_exclusive_wait(wq, &q->wait, &q->key);
-		return ret;
-	} while (test_and_set_bit(q->key.bit_nr, q->key.flags));
-	finish_wait(wq, &q->wait);
-	return 0;
+		if (test_bit(q->key.bit_nr, q->key.flags)) {
+			ret = action(&q->key, mode);
+			/*
+			 * Ensure that clear_bit() + wake_up() right after
+			 * test_and_set_bit() below can't see us; it should
+			 * wake up another exclusive waiter if we fail.
+			 */
+			if (ret)
+				finish_wait(wq, &q->wait);
+		}
+		if (!test_and_set_bit(q->key.bit_nr, q->key.flags)) {
+			if (!ret)
+				finish_wait(wq, &q->wait);
+			return 0;
+		} else if (ret) {
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__wait_on_bit_lock);
 
-- 
2.5.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-26 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-26 12:44 [PATCH 0/2] sched/wait: abort_exclusive_wait() should pass TASK_NORMAL to wake_up() Oleg Nesterov
2016-08-26 12:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Oleg Nesterov
2016-09-01 11:39   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-01 17:26     ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-09-01 18:09       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-26 12:45 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2016-08-26 12:47   ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/wait: avoid abort_exclusive_wait() in __wait_on_bit_lock() Oleg Nesterov
2016-09-01 19:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-01 19:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-02 12:06       ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-09-01 22:17     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-02 12:06       ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-09-02 13:20         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-02 12:06     ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-09-01 11:03 ` [PATCH 0/2] sched/wait: abort_exclusive_wait() should pass TASK_NORMAL to wake_up() Peter Zijlstra
     [not found] <00e501d201cf$7bfecd40$73fc67c0$@alibaba-inc.com>
2016-08-29  8:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/wait: avoid abort_exclusive_wait() in __wait_on_bit_lock() Hillf Danton
2016-08-29 13:48   ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160826124552.GB28904@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome