From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: airlied@linux.ie, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, tomi.valkeinen@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: drm_probe_helper: Fix output_poll_work scheduling
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:58:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160829125857.GK10980@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160829095022.12160-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:50:22PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> drm_kms_helper_poll_enable_locked() should check if we have delayed event
> pending and if we have, schedule the work to run without delay.
>
> Currently the output_poll_work is only scheduled if any of the connectors
> have DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_CONNECT or DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_DISCONNECT with
> DRM_OUTPUT_POLL_PERIOD delay. It does not matter if we have delayed event
> already registered to be handled. The detection will be delayd by
> DRM_OUTPUT_POLL_PERIOD in any case.
> Furthermore if none of the connectors are marked as POLL_CONNECT or
> POLL_DISCONNECT because all connectors are either POLL_HPD or they are
> always connected: the output_poll_work will not run at all even if we
> have delayed event marked.
>
> When none of the connectors require polling, their initial status change
> from unknown to connected/disconnected is not going to be handled until
> the first kms application starts or if we have fb console enabled.
>
> With this change we can react more quickly to output status changes after
> enabling the poll but most importantly it will correct the behavior when
> none of the connector have POLL_CONNECT or POLL_DISCONNECT flag set - they
> are either POLL_HPD or the .polled is 0. The initial status change is going
> to be handled correctly as well.
Don't we need to set delayed_event somewhere too first? At least I don't
really understand how this speeds things up ... The patch itself looks
like a valid bugfix, but the description confuses me a bit. I think if you
delete the above paragraph (starting with "With this change we can react
...") then it's all good.
-Daniel
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c
> index a0df377d7d1c..f6b64d7d3528 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_probe_helper.c
> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ void drm_kms_helper_poll_enable_locked(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> bool poll = false;
> struct drm_connector *connector;
> + unsigned long delay = DRM_OUTPUT_POLL_PERIOD;
>
> WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev->mode_config.mutex));
>
> @@ -141,8 +142,13 @@ void drm_kms_helper_poll_enable_locked(struct drm_device *dev)
> poll = true;
> }
>
> + if (dev->mode_config.delayed_event) {
> + poll = true;
> + delay = 0;
> + }
> +
> if (poll)
> - schedule_delayed_work(&dev->mode_config.output_poll_work, DRM_OUTPUT_POLL_PERIOD);
> + schedule_delayed_work(&dev->mode_config.output_poll_work, delay);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_kms_helper_poll_enable_locked);
>
> --
> 2.9.3
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-29 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-29 9:50 Peter Ujfalusi
2016-08-29 12:58 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2016-08-29 13:30 ` Peter Ujfalusi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160829125857.GK10980@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®