From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756275AbcH3U6i (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:58:38 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0055.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.55]:42959 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750980AbcH3U6e (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:58:34 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,rostedt@goodmis.org,:::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:560:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3351:3622:3865:3866:3870:3871:3873:3874:5007:6119:6261:7875:7903:9040:10004:10400:10848:10967:11232:11658:11914:12663:12740:13069:13311:13357:13439:14181:14659:14721:21080:21212:30034:30054:30060:30090:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: maid64_67898a89e0a19 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1860 Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:58:30 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Marcin Nowakowski , Linux API , Ingo Molnar , open list , Linux MIPS Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing/syscalls: allow multiple syscall numbers per syscall Message-ID: <20160830165830.5e494c43@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <1472463007-6469-1-git-send-email-marcin.nowakowski@imgtec.com> <20160830152955.17633511@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:53:53 -0700 Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Egads! OK, I see why this is a mess. :-) > > I guess we should be creating the metadata from the syscall tables > instead of from the syscall definitions, but I guess that's currently > a nasty per-arch mess. Yep. > > Could we at least have an array of (arch, nr) instead of just an array > of nrs in the metadata? I guess I'm not following you on what would be used for "arch". -- Steve