From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754758AbcIEB1t (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Sep 2016 21:27:49 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:38885 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754244AbcIEB1p (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Sep 2016 21:27:45 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 11:27:42 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Catalin Marinas Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland , Ard Biesheuvel , Will Deacon Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with Linus' tree Message-ID: <20160905112742.668cb341@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Catalin, Today's linux-next merge of the arm64 tree got a conflict in: arch/arm64/kernel/head.S between commit: fd363bd417dd ("arm64: avoid TLB conflict with CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE") from Linus' tree and commit: 3c5e9f238bc4 ("arm64: head.S: move KASLR processing out of __enable_mmu()") from the arm64 tree. I fixed it up (the latter included the former change, so I just used that) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell