From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757067AbcIGOBh (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2016 10:01:37 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:39831 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752699AbcIGOBf (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2016 10:01:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:01:02 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , rt@linutronix.de, Thomas Gleixner , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , ACPI Devel Maling List Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/21] ACPI: processor: Convert to hotplug state machine Message-ID: <20160907140102.pcjxtqs7pvkvusao@linutronix.de> References: <20160906170457.32393-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20160906170457.32393-12-bigeasy@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/ (1.7.0) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2016-09-06 23:08:28 [+0200], Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This appears to be part of a series, but what if it goes in > separately? Would that be a problem? You would have to deal with conflicts in cpuhotplug.h. All other requirements are merged. > Thanks, > Rafael Sebastian