From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757732AbcIHWTg (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:19:36 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:45641 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757385AbcIHWTf (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:19:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 15:19:33 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Noam Camus Cc: , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] lib/bitmap.c: enhance bitmap syntax Message-Id: <20160908151933.1f48a10e757e5af5435f8daa@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1473348805-7145-1-git-send-email-noamca@mellanox.com> References: <1468743057-29498-1-git-send-email-noamca@mellanox.com> <1473348805-7145-1-git-send-email-noamca@mellanox.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:33:25 +0300 Noam Camus wrote: > Today there are platforms with many CPUs (up to 4K). > Trying to boot only part of the CPUs may result in too long string. > > For example lets take NPS platform that is part of arch/arc. > This platform have SMP system with 256 cores each with > 16 HW threads (SMT machine) where HW thread appears as CPU to the kernel. > In this example there is total of 4K CPUs. > When one tries to boot only part of the HW threads from each core the > string representing the map may be long... > For example if for sake of performance we decided to boot only first half > of HW threads of each core the map will look like: > 0-7,16-23,32-39,...,4080-4087 > > This patch introduce new syntax to accommodate with such use case. > I added an optional postfix to a range of CPUs which will choose > according to given modulo the desired range of reminders i.e.: > :sed_size/group_size > > For example, above map can be described in new syntax like this: > 0-4095:8/16 There should be some updates to the user-facing documentation, please. Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt, mainly. Which boot parameters does this affect? For example, I think it accidentally alters isolcpus=? It would be useful to see the patch which wires this up (to arch/arc?).