From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754010AbcIIRiU (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2016 13:38:20 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35557 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751438AbcIIRiS (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2016 13:38:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 19:38:14 +0200 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Daniel Wagner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei , "Luis R . Rodriguez" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Srivatsa S . Bhat" , "rafael.j.wysocki" , Daniel Vetter , Takashi Iwai , Bjorn Andersson , Arend van Spriel , Daniel Wagner Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] firmware: encapsulate firmware loading status Message-ID: <20160909173814.GM3296@wotan.suse.de> References: <1473423144-21734-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1473423144-21734-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 02:12:19PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote: > From: Daniel Wagner > > Hi, > > The firmware user helper code tracks the current state of the loading > process via an member of struct firmware_buf and a completion. Let's > encapsulate this simple state machine into struct fw_status. The aim is > to increase readability and reduce the usage of the fw_lock. > > Luis asked by to add a few CC for getting a wider audience. If you > haven't seen this before the initial version of this series has some > more details on the motivation for this series: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg153005.html > > I tested this series with fw_userhelper.sh and fw_filesystem.sh under > kvm and also let it run on real hardware. The series is also available > here: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wagi/linux.git/log/?h=firmware_async-7 Ah, this series is looking so much nicer now thanks! > I had pushed earlier version of series there and haven't got any 0-day > bug reports so far. 0-day eventually sends a complete success report if you're good. That's when you can get a warm fuzzy over your series. Found just one more issue. Since that means another respin I'll provide some other nitpicks. Luis