From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755475AbcIIWTc (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2016 18:19:32 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:57288 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754430AbcIIWTb (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2016 18:19:31 -0400 Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 00:19:29 +0200 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Daniel Wagner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei , "Luis R . Rodriguez" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "rafael.j.wysocki" , Daniel Vetter , Takashi Iwai , Bjorn Andersson , Arend van Spriel , Daniel Wagner Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] firmware: encapsulate firmware loading status Message-ID: <20160909221929.GQ3296@wotan.suse.de> References: <1473423144-21734-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> <1473423144-21734-3-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1473423144-21734-3-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 02:12:21PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote: > +#else /* CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER */ > + > +#define fw_umh_wait_timeout(fw_st, long) 0 > + > +#define fw_umh_done(fw_st) > +#define fw_umh_is_done(fw_st) true > +#define fw_umh_is_aborted(fw_st) false > + If we do proceed with compartmentalizing the UMH timeout crap then my hope is this piece of code will not require the fw_umh_wait_timeout() def. Luis