From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764345AbcINTH6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:07:58 -0400 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:54694 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764170AbcINTHt (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:07:49 -0400 From: "Eric W. Biederman" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Containers , "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:53:36 -0500 Message-Id: <20160914185338.15126-4-ebiederm@xmission.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.3 In-Reply-To: <20160914185338.15126-1-ebiederm@xmission.com> References: <87sht25n73.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20160914185338.15126-1-ebiederm@xmission.com> X-XM-SPF: eid=1bkFX3-0000r5-Im;;;mid=<20160914185338.15126-4-ebiederm@xmission.com>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=97.119.97.64;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX180CS8DAMQDTAlEj11EMFL2/uL20NNubC8= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 97.119.97.64 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa08 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 T_TooManySym_02 5+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa08 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 1676 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 1406 (83.9%), b_tie_ro: 1402 (83.6%), parse: 1.05 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 25 (1.5%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.57 (0.0%), tests_pri_-1000: 14 (0.8%), tests_pri_-950: 17 (1.0%), tests_pri_-900: 1.02 (0.1%), tests_pri_-400: 25 (1.5%), check_bayes: 24 (1.4%), b_tokenize: 3.7 (0.2%), b_tok_get_all: 9 (0.5%), b_comp_prob: 1.14 (0.1%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.2 (0.1%), b_finish: 0.75 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 166 (9.9%), check_dkim_signature: 0.69 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.6 (0.2%), tests_pri_500: 10 (0.6%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [PATCH tty-next 4/6] devpts: Make devpts_kill_sb safe if fsi is NULL X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- fs/devpts/inode.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/devpts/inode.c b/fs/devpts/inode.c index a48b40b0bd1e..e058ec677207 100644 --- a/fs/devpts/inode.c +++ b/fs/devpts/inode.c @@ -458,7 +458,8 @@ static void devpts_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb) { struct pts_fs_info *fsi = DEVPTS_SB(sb); - ida_destroy(&fsi->allocated_ptys); + if (fsi) + ida_destroy(&fsi->allocated_ptys); kfree(fsi); kill_litter_super(sb); } -- 2.8.3