From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764941AbcIOATM (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 20:19:12 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:58978 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764190AbcIOATL (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 20:19:11 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:19:08 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Kevin Hilman , Carlo Caione , Linus Walleij Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Deepak Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the amlogic tree with the pinctrl tree Message-ID: <20160915101908.08f24fe1@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the amlogic tree got a conflict in: drivers/base/pinctrl.c between commit: 23b4ed268076 ("driver: base: pinctrl: return error from pinctrl_bind_pins()") from the pinctrl tree and commit: eb4ec68acf5e ("driver: base: pinctrl: return error from pinctrl_bind_pins()") from the amlogic tree. I fixed it up (I used the version from the pinctrl tree) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell