From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934322AbcIPRPl (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:15:41 -0400 Received: from tex.lwn.net ([70.33.254.29]:51331 "EHLO vena.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757455AbcIPRPd (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:15:33 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:15:31 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Markus Heiser , Jani Nikula , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/21] Documentation/kernel-docs.txt: convert it to ReST markup Message-ID: <20160916111531.5dd2ad58@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <877b1fd8d94ce4eb2325da828547b4ac4419a887.1473849886.git.mchehab@s-opensource.com> References: <877b1fd8d94ce4eb2325da828547b4ac4419a887.1473849886.git.mchehab@s-opensource.com> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:06:40 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > This one required lots of manual work, for it to be properly > displayed. And, honestly, I wonder if it was worth it. This document contains no entries for any recent documents, many of the links in it are long since dead, and I honestly doubt it has been helpful to anybody. If we keep it should definitely be marked as historical cruft, but I wonder if it's worth even that much effort? Thanks, jon