mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] PM / OPP: Don't support OPP if it provides supported-hw but platform does not
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 10:47:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160926051759.GK17336@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160923200747.3948-1-d-gerlach@ti.com>

On 23-09-16, 15:07, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> The OPP framework allows each OPP to set a opp-supported-hw property
> which provides values that are matched against supported_hw values
> provided by the platform to limit support for certain OPPs on specific
> hardware. Currently, if the platform does not set supported_hw values,
> all OPPs are interpreted as supported, even if they have provided their
> own opp-supported-hw values.
> 
> If an OPP has provided opp-supported-hw, it is indicating that there is
> some specific hardware configuration it is supported by. These constraints
> should be honored, and if no supported_hw has been provided by the
> platform, there is no way to determine if that OPP is actually supported,
> so it should be marked as not supported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/opp/of.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c
> index 1dfd3dd92624..ccccaf9f8968 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c
> @@ -71,8 +71,18 @@ static bool _opp_is_supported(struct device *dev, struct opp_table *opp_table,
>  	u32 version;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (!opp_table->supported_hw)
> -		return true;
> +	if (!opp_table->supported_hw) {
> +		/*
> +		 * In the case that no supported_hw has been set by the
> +		 * platform but there is an opp-supported-hw value set for
> +		 * an OPP then the OPP should not be enabled as there is
> +		 * no way to see if the hardware supports it.
> +		 */
> +		if (of_find_property(np, "opp-supported-hw", NULL))
> +			return false;
> +		else
> +			return true;
> +	}
>  
>  	while (count--) {
>  		ret = of_property_read_u32_index(np, "opp-supported-hw", count,

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-09-26  5:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-23 20:07 Dave Gerlach
2016-09-23 20:09 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-09-26  5:17 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160926051759.GK17336@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=d-gerlach@ti.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®