mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, juri.lelli@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, xlpang@redhat.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	jdesfossez@efficios.com, bristot@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH -v2 1/9] rtmutex: Deboost before waking up the top waiter
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:32:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160926124127.863639194@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160926123213.851818224@infradead.org>

[-- Attachment #1: xunlei_pang-rtmutex-deboost_before_waking_up_the_top_waiter.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4552 bytes --]

We should deboost before waking the high-priority task, such that we
don't run two tasks with the same "state" (priority, deadline,
sched_class, etc).

In order to make sure the boosting task doesn't start running between
unlock and deboost (due to 'spurious' wakeup), we move the deboost
under the wait_lock, that way its serialized against the wait loop in
__rt_mutex_slowlock().

Doing the deboost early can however lead to priority-inversion if
current would get preempted after the deboost but before waking our
high-prio task, hence we disable preemption before doing deboost, and
enabling it after the wake up is over.

This gets us the right semantic order, but most importantly however;
this change ensures pointer stability for the next patch, where we
have rt_mutex_setprio() cache a pointer to the top-most waiter task.
If we, as before this change, do the wakeup first and then deboost,
this pointer might point into thin air.

[peterz: Changelog + patch munging]
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---

 kernel/futex.c                  |    5 +---
 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c        |   48 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h |    1 
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1374,9 +1374,8 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uad
 	 * scheduled away before the wake up can take place.
 	 */
 	spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
-	wake_up_q(&wake_q);
-	if (deboost)
-		rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current);
+
+	rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q, deboost);
 
 	return 0;
 }
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -307,24 +307,6 @@ static void __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struc
 }
 
 /*
- * Adjust task priority (undo boosting). Called from the exit path of
- * rt_mutex_slowunlock() and rt_mutex_slowlock().
- *
- * (Note: We do this outside of the protection of lock->wait_lock to
- * allow the lock to be taken while or before we readjust the priority
- * of task. We do not use the spin_xx_mutex() variants here as we are
- * outside of the debug path.)
- */
-void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
-	__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
-}
-
-/*
  * Deadlock detection is conditional:
  *
  * If CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=n, deadlock detection is only conducted
@@ -987,6 +969,7 @@ static void mark_wakeup_next_waiter(stru
 	 * lock->wait_lock.
 	 */
 	rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(current, waiter);
+	__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current);
 
 	/*
 	 * As we are waking up the top waiter, and the waiter stays
@@ -1325,6 +1308,16 @@ static bool __sched rt_mutex_slowunlock(
 	 */
 	mark_wakeup_next_waiter(wake_q, lock);
 
+	/*
+	 * We should deboost before waking the top waiter task such that
+	 * we don't run two tasks with the 'same' priority. This however
+	 * can lead to prio-inversion if we would get preempted after
+	 * the deboost but before waking our high-prio task, hence the
+	 * preempt_disable before unlock. Pairs with preempt_enable() in
+	 * rt_mutex_postunlock();
+	 */
+	preempt_disable();
+
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
 
 	/* check PI boosting */
@@ -1390,14 +1383,23 @@ rt_mutex_fastunlock(struct rt_mutex *loc
 	} else {
 		bool deboost = slowfn(lock, &wake_q);
 
-		wake_up_q(&wake_q);
-
-		/* Undo pi boosting if necessary: */
-		if (deboost)
-			rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current);
+		rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q, deboost);
 	}
 }
 
+
+/*
+ * Undo pi boosting (if necessary) and wake top waiter.
+ */
+void rt_mutex_postunlock(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, bool deboost)
+{
+	wake_up_q(wake_q);
+
+	/* Pairs with preempt_disable() in rt_mutex_slowunlock() */
+	if (deboost)
+		preempt_enable();
+}
+
 /**
  * rt_mutex_lock - lock a rt_mutex
  *
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ extern int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(st
 extern int rt_mutex_timed_futex_lock(struct rt_mutex *l, struct hrtimer_sleeper *to);
 extern bool rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 				  struct wake_q_head *wqh);
+extern void rt_mutex_postunlock(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, bool deboost);
 extern void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-26 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-26 12:32 [PATCH -v2 0/9] PI and assorted failings Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-26 12:32 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-09-26 15:15   ` [PATCH -v2 1/9] rtmutex: Deboost before waking up the top waiter Steven Rostedt
2016-09-26 15:22     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-26 15:35       ` Steven Rostedt
2016-09-26 15:37         ` Steven Rostedt
2016-09-26 15:41           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-29 14:43             ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-29 14:49               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-26 15:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-28  9:07   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-09-28  9:24     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-26 12:32 ` [PATCH -v2 2/9] sched/rtmutex/deadline: Fix a PI crash for deadline tasks Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-26 15:20   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-09-26 15:26     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-29 14:49   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-26 12:32 ` [PATCH -v2 3/9] sched/deadline/rtmutex: Dont miss the dl_runtime/dl_period update Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-26 16:03   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-09-29 14:48   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-26 12:32 ` [PATCH -v2 4/9] rtmutex: Remove rt_mutex_fastunlock() Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-29 14:47   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-26 12:32 ` [PATCH -v2 5/9] rtmutex: Clean up Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-26 16:09   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-09-29 14:51     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-26 12:32 ` [PATCH -v2 6/9] sched/rtmutex: Refactor rt_mutex_setprio() Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-26 16:57   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-09-26 12:32 ` [PATCH -v2 7/9] sched,tracing: Update trace_sched_pi_setprio() Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-26 17:04   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-09-27  7:44     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-26 12:32 ` [PATCH -v2 8/9] rtmutex: Fix PI chain order integrity Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-26 12:32 ` [PATCH -v2 9/9] rtmutex: Fix more prio comparisons Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160926124127.863639194@infradead.org \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=jdesfossez@efficios.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®