From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S964950AbcI1CFb (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 27 Sep 2016 22:05:31 -0400
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:55870 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S933592AbcI1CFW (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 27 Sep 2016 22:05:22 -0400
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 22:05:11 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20160927.220511.705482563584058575.davem@davemloft.net>
To: kernel@kyup.com
Cc: mszeredi@redhat.com, hannes@stressinduktion.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at net/unix/garbage.c:149!"
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <57EA7F3B.3030801@kyup.com>
References: <CAOssrKedUEAcZThhd2FB9UPzhr+5ErLjB=3+1z1XdnFeP6wvmg@mail.gmail.com>
        <CAOssrKcfncAYsQWkfLGFgoOxAQJVT2hYVWdBA6Cw7hhO8RJ_wQ@mail.gmail.com>
        <57EA7F3B.3030801@kyup.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Tue, 27 Sep 2016 19:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

From: Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:16:27 +0300

> What's the status of https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/664062/ , is
> this going to be picked up ?

Why would I apply a patch that's an RFC, doesn't have a proper commit
message, lacks a proper signoff, and also lacks ACK's and feedback
from other knowledgable developers?