From: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [Patch 23/35] media: ti-vpe: sc: Fix incorrect optimization
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:22:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160928212239.27355-1-bparrot@ti.com> (raw)
From: Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@ti.com>
Current scaler library implementation of sc_set_hs_coeffs and
sc_set_vs_coeffs tries to return immediately if the calculated
coefficient index is already being used.
As the same scaler block is going to be used for all the VPE contexts,
even if the calculated index is same, the parameters have to be
reconfigured for each of the context.
Because of this, when multiple contexts use the same coefficients,
all other contexts would have zero scaling coefficients.
Fix this and also remove the unnecessary hs_index and vs_index fields.
Signed-off-by: Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
---
drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/sc.c | 9 ---------
drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/sc.h | 3 ---
2 files changed, 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/sc.c b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/sc.c
index f82d1c7f667f..02f3dae8ae42 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/sc.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/sc.c
@@ -84,9 +84,6 @@ void sc_set_hs_coeffs(struct sc_data *sc, void *addr, unsigned int src_w,
}
}
- if (idx == sc->hs_index)
- return;
-
cp = scaler_hs_coeffs[idx];
for (i = 0; i < SC_NUM_PHASES * 2; i++) {
@@ -101,8 +98,6 @@ void sc_set_hs_coeffs(struct sc_data *sc, void *addr, unsigned int src_w,
coeff_h += SC_NUM_TAPS_MEM_ALIGN - SC_H_NUM_TAPS;
}
- sc->hs_index = idx;
-
sc->load_coeff_h = true;
}
@@ -130,9 +125,6 @@ void sc_set_vs_coeffs(struct sc_data *sc, void *addr, unsigned int src_h,
idx = VS_LT_9_16_SCALE + sixteenths - 8;
}
- if (idx == sc->vs_index)
- return;
-
cp = scaler_vs_coeffs[idx];
for (i = 0; i < SC_NUM_PHASES * 2; i++) {
@@ -146,7 +138,6 @@ void sc_set_vs_coeffs(struct sc_data *sc, void *addr, unsigned int src_h,
coeff_v += SC_NUM_TAPS_MEM_ALIGN - SC_V_NUM_TAPS;
}
- sc->vs_index = idx;
sc->load_coeff_v = true;
}
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/sc.h b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/sc.h
index 60e411e05c30..de947db98990 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/sc.h
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/sc.h
@@ -189,9 +189,6 @@ struct sc_data {
bool load_coeff_h; /* have new h SC coeffs */
bool load_coeff_v; /* have new v SC coeffs */
- unsigned int hs_index; /* h SC coeffs selector */
- unsigned int vs_index; /* v SC coeffs selector */
-
struct platform_device *pdev;
};
--
2.9.0
reply other threads:[~2016-09-28 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160928212239.27355-1-bparrot@ti.com \
--to=bparrot@ti.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®