From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753359AbcJKVmt (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:42:49 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:37146 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752581AbcJKVms (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:42:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 23:41:40 +0200 From: Sebastian Reichel To: Pavel Machek Cc: pali.rohar@gmail.com, kernel list , linux-arm-kernel , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, khilman@kernel.org, aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com, patrikbachan@gmail.com, serge@hallyn.com Subject: Re: latest version of bluetooth for n950? Message-ID: <20161011214139.cgxe2ms7qjgruuxb@earth> References: <20161011074704.GA21003@amd> <20161011145140.cq3jex2r23wuayph@earth> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3kztabrpv2i5z6ye" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161011145140.cq3jex2r23wuayph@earth> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20160916 (1.7.0) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --3kztabrpv2i5z6ye Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 04:51:40PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:47:04AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > I got some free cycles to play with n900 and bluetooth. There's still > > some unrelated config option that breaks even the old vesion of > > patches, but I'm ready for more debugging now. > >=20 > > Could I have the latest version of the (clean) bluetooth patch? I have > > feeling it might work with the right config option, and would like to > > try. > >=20 > > For the record, here's working .config and the tricky tricky oneliner > > that took me week to figure out. >=20 > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/sre/linux-n900.git/log/?h=3D= n950-bluetooth >=20 > My local branch is based on 4.8 and fixes a few of Marcel's > comments. I'm currently at ELCE, but I will push my local > stuff later in the hotel after verifying, that it works as > expected (luckily I brought N950 with me :)). It does not. Rebasing the pushed branch to v4.8 works, so the problem is somewhere in my new changes. I will try to have a look at it tomorrow. The changes shouldn't affect you for any tests, though. Just take the branch from above (and optionally rebase to v4.8). -- Sebastian --3kztabrpv2i5z6ye Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAABCgAGBQJX/VyQAAoJENju1/PIO/qa9KkP/1Y+xO7yT1chi/Qvq5YuQwoa ufV1VDuVnfR3HdJGR80ZwdB0h3dC/9gwty4wTyBFXrxHdZtHIbXu4fWNkmkjKAv8 /ywnvnlXTqbJZenSg2YYTjQxPCe12y7Gp4O+ZDSUKv555vplvPOghmNhRBZoh7PC 3HNH0cijAn5zqE1XorQN/CDGgH60+KMQyfrD2QilSQDTzgFezc5gi9bWUYLP4vBX cuf2zl9RXK0wqKc4QS4AGMHrM70r0ZMMNsv7xDeaO2nWFpL2SbkBD/5+tAmNJub3 +WMyT2nsuec53/GfES/SlhqjGYHKB2ylRvUaINcFRdnxjTeCViIGBqMDcRcOVM9D oXFoYl6JDWh0g0/VLb6ErdLrjlym+jOan5OP5HQvhydLIIOX1O59yfWGc9ByZUlM kvW1Llp5pil0okYe/he18m1oGgZnIA6znnjznlU3Rx1GrqvDnBhCuD4/RUg0uRqy xqCZj5gnrwaTa0M3SPr/KOI8vvwh9UVWQ3ipojkM/xRM5rF6aRSEn0Lw6fVr8I6q 1z6PpMZaXteTL0VMUFEWbieZ+ehLZktRfeMSWjOdnYVK8bBgmktn/FZC+ekxsg98 a13cu7NdtgN5BsQytyltq4Owk+yuTTaw2YF07Jc0irGif3M5SWxIpWU7W3ZKmU++ CXRLGGaOQXsQ5IaXxkAi =1dA5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3kztabrpv2i5z6ye--