mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jarod@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/2] net: centralize net_device MTU bounds checking
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:37:36 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161013.093736.2110253872628350396.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161008020434.9691-1-jarod@redhat.com>

From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Date: Fri,  7 Oct 2016 22:04:32 -0400

> While looking into an MTU issue with sfc, I started noticing that almost
> every NIC driver with an ndo_change_mtu function implemented almost
> exactly the same range checks, and in many cases, that was the only
> practical thing their ndo_change_mtu function was doing. Quite a few
> drivers have either 68, 64, 60 or 46 as their minimum MTU value checked,
> and then various sizes from 1500 to 65535 for their maximum MTU value. We
> can remove a whole lot of redundant code here if we simple store min_mtu
> and max_mtu in net_device, and check against those in net/core/dev.c's
> dev_set_mtu().
> 
> This pair of patches looks to introduce centralized MTU range checking
> infrastructure, while maintaining compatibility with all existing drivers,
> and start to make use of it, converting all eth_change_mtu/ether_setup users
> over to this new infra.
> 
> Assuming these pass review muster, I've got a ton of follow-on patches to
> clean up MTU settings for everything in the kernel with an ndo_change_mtu.
> 
> This work is all staged in a (rebasing) git tree here:
> 
> https://github.com/jarodwilson/linux-muck
> 
> The master branch is based on net-next from Oct 7, and carries these two
> patches, plus a ton of follow-on patches to eliminate MTU range checks
> and change_mtu functions where possible. All patches were successfully
> built across 160 various arch and config combos by the 0-day folks.
> (Thanks to Andrew Lunn for the suggestion to get that going).

Looks great, series applied, thanks Jarod!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-13 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-12 20:11 [PATCH " Jarod Wilson
2016-09-12 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: centralize net_device min/max MTU checking Jarod Wilson
2016-09-12 20:11 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: deprecate eth_change_mtu, remove usage Jarod Wilson
2016-09-13 21:59   ` kbuild test robot
2016-09-14 18:45     ` Jarod Wilson
2016-09-28 21:17 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] net: centralize net_device MTU bounds checking Jarod Wilson
2016-09-28 21:17   ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] net: centralize net_device min/max MTU checking Jarod Wilson
2016-09-28 21:17   ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] net: deprecate eth_change_mtu, remove usage Jarod Wilson
2016-09-28 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] net: centralize net_device MTU bounds checking Jarod Wilson
2016-09-28 22:20   ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] net: centralize net_device min/max MTU checking Jarod Wilson
2016-09-30  9:37     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2016-10-03  2:43       ` David Miller
2016-10-03 17:46         ` Jarod Wilson
2016-10-08  2:04         ` [PATCH v3 net-next 0/2] net: centralize net_device MTU bounds checking Jarod Wilson
2016-10-08  2:04           ` [PATCH v3 net-next 1/2] net: centralize net_device min/max MTU checking Jarod Wilson
2016-10-08  2:04           ` [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] net: deprecate eth_change_mtu, remove usage Jarod Wilson
2016-10-17 16:20             ` Jakub Kicinski
2016-10-17 16:49               ` David Miller
2016-10-17 17:00                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2016-10-17 17:04                   ` Jakub Kicinski
2016-10-17 17:15                   ` David Miller
2016-10-17 17:20                     ` Jakub Kicinski
2016-10-17 17:25                       ` David Miller
2016-10-17 20:07                         ` Jarod Wilson
2016-10-17 20:22                           ` Jarod Wilson
2016-10-13 13:37           ` David Miller [this message]
2016-09-28 22:20   ` [PATCH v2 " Jarod Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161013.093736.2110253872628350396.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jarod@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®