mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, dmonakhov@openvz.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: fix a use after free (and fix freeze protection of aio writes)
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:54:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161017195428.GZ3568@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161017185552.GA24653@lst.de>

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:55:52PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:19:47PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> > This ends up being a call to __sb_end_write:
> > 
> > void __sb_end_write(struct super_block *sb, int level)
> > {
> >         percpu_up_read(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level-1);
> > }
> > 
> > Nothing guarantees that submission and completion happen on the same
> > CPU.  Is this safe?
> 
> Good point.  From my reading of the percpu_rwsem implementation it
> is not safe to release it from a different CPU.  Which makes me
> wonder how we can protect aio writes properly here..

percpu-rwsem has the same semantics as regular rwsems, so preemptible
and 'owner' stuff.

Therefore we must support doing up from a different cpu than we did down
on; the owner could've been migrated while we held it.

And while there's a metric ton of tricky in the implementation, this
part is actually fairly straight forward. We only care about the direct
sum of the per-cpu counter, see readers_active_check() -> per_cpu_sum().

So one cpu doing an inc and another doing a dec summed is still 0.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-17 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-16  5:51 Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-17 18:19 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-10-17 18:55   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-17 19:40     ` Jeff Moyer
2016-10-17 19:54       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-17 20:04         ` Jeff Moyer
2016-10-17 20:04           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-17 19:54     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-10-17 20:05 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-10-24  6:36 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161017195428.GZ3568@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome