From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, dmonakhov@openvz.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: fix a use after free (and fix freeze protection of aio writes)
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:54:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161017195428.GZ3568@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161017185552.GA24653@lst.de>
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:55:52PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:19:47PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> > This ends up being a call to __sb_end_write:
> >
> > void __sb_end_write(struct super_block *sb, int level)
> > {
> > percpu_up_read(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level-1);
> > }
> >
> > Nothing guarantees that submission and completion happen on the same
> > CPU. Is this safe?
>
> Good point. From my reading of the percpu_rwsem implementation it
> is not safe to release it from a different CPU. Which makes me
> wonder how we can protect aio writes properly here..
percpu-rwsem has the same semantics as regular rwsems, so preemptible
and 'owner' stuff.
Therefore we must support doing up from a different cpu than we did down
on; the owner could've been migrated while we held it.
And while there's a metric ton of tricky in the implementation, this
part is actually fairly straight forward. We only care about the direct
sum of the per-cpu counter, see readers_active_check() -> per_cpu_sum().
So one cpu doing an inc and another doing a dec summed is still 0.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-17 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-16 5:51 Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-17 18:19 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-10-17 18:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-17 19:40 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-10-17 19:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-17 20:04 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-10-17 20:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-17 19:54 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-10-17 20:05 ` Jeff Moyer
2016-10-24 6:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161017195428.GZ3568@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome