From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Honggyu Kim <hong.gyu.kim@lge.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tools lib traceevent: Add -O2 option to traceevent
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:21:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161019152156.4149ca74@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161019180548.GF25522@kernel.org>
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 15:05:48 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> Some are the compiler not grokking logic where the compiler gets
> confused with logic that tests one variable to use another and thinks it
> is using garbage (uninitialized stuff), I tried to follow the logic and
> I think it got slightly more confused than me, as I _think_ its not a
> problem, but the one on the case entry for
>
> OLD_RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_EXTEND
>
> in old_update_pointers() looks like a bug, unless some macro magic is
> taking place that updates that 'lenght' variable.
>
> Rostedt, that -O2 unleashed some warnings, please check, I'll defer
> applying those patches till it doesn't show these warnings, i.e. till
> other patches fixing these issues or simply silencing the compiler with
> a harmless init gets submitted,
>
> Thanks,
Note, that code is for the first version of the ftrace ring buffer that
got changed around 2.6.32 I believe. And since trace-cmd was the only
tool that directly looked at the code, I was able to "break" abi and
update trace-cmd to have a new version. So that code isn't even used
anywhere on newer kernels.
That said, could you add in the case statement for
OLD_RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_EXTEND:
length = 0;
I think that should be fine.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-19 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-17 14:17 Honggyu Kim
2016-10-17 14:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] tools lib traceevent: Check the return value of asprintf Honggyu Kim
2016-10-18 17:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-10-19 0:25 ` Namhyung Kim
2016-10-17 14:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] tools lib traceevent: Fix to set uninitialized variables Honggyu Kim
2016-10-18 17:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-10-18 2:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] tools lib traceevent: Add -O2 option to traceevent Namhyung Kim
2016-10-18 15:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-10-19 17:48 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-10-19 18:05 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-10-19 18:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-10-19 19:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-10-19 19:21 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2016-10-19 18:21 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161019152156.4149ca74@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=hong.gyu.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®