From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S945963AbcJSQDF (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:03:05 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:54036 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S942418AbcJSQDC (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:03:02 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:03:07 +0200 From: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: Roberto Manuel SARA , "jslaby@suse.com" , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: drivers/tty/serial/max310x doesn't support latest UART revision of MAX14830 Message-ID: <20161019160307.GB5533@kroah.com> References: <20161019081859.GA5747@kroah.com> <20161019150344.5t56nl6zjxltuzbv@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20161019150344.5t56nl6zjxltuzbv@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 05:03:44PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:18:59AM +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:12:13AM +0000, Roberto Manuel SARA wrote: > > > Confidentiality Warning: This message and any > > > attachments are intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are > > > confidential, and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you > > > are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, > > > copying, circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is > > > strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the > > > sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message and any > > > attachments from your system. Thank-you. > > > > I am not allowed to respond to such emails as it is not compatible with > > doing work in the open for Linux. Please remove and I will be glad to > > reply. > > INAL, but from a logical POV: When this mail was sent to a public > mailing list, everyone could consider itself being an "intended > recipient" which would lift all limitations. :-) Not according to my lawyer, who is one, and whom I trust better than random people claiming not to be one :) thanks, greg k-h