From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
"Noralf Trønnes" <noralf@tronnes.org>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/fb-helper: Fix race between deferred_io worker and dirty updater
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:20:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161020132055.9646-1-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
Since 4.7 kernel, we've seen the error messages like
kernel: [TTM] Buffer eviction failed
kernel: qxl 0000:00:02.0: object_init failed for (4026540032, 0x00000001)
kernel: [drm:qxl_alloc_bo_reserved [qxl]] *ERROR* failed to allocate VRAM BO
on QXL when switching and accessing on VT. The culprit was the generic
deferred_io code (qxl driver switched to it since 4.7). There is a
race between the dirty clip update and the call of callback.
In drm_fb_helper_dirty(), the dirty clip is updated in the spinlock,
while it kicks off the update worker outside the spinlock. Meanwhile
the update worker clears the dirty clip in the spinlock, too. Thus,
when drm_fb_helper_dirty() is called concurrently, schedule_work() is
called after the clip is cleared in the first worker call.
The fix is simply moving schedule_work() inside the spinlock.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98322
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003298
Fixes: eaa434defaca ('drm/fb-helper: Add fb_deferred_io support')
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
index 03414bde1f15..bae392dea2cc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
@@ -861,9 +861,8 @@ static void drm_fb_helper_dirty(struct fb_info *info, u32 x, u32 y,
clip->y1 = min_t(u32, clip->y1, y);
clip->x2 = max_t(u32, clip->x2, x + width);
clip->y2 = max_t(u32, clip->y2, y + height);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&helper->dirty_lock, flags);
-
schedule_work(&helper->dirty_work);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&helper->dirty_lock, flags);
}
/**
--
2.10.1
next reply other threads:[~2016-10-20 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-20 13:20 Takashi Iwai [this message]
2016-10-20 13:23 ` Takashi Iwai
2016-10-20 13:28 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-10-20 13:36 ` Takashi Iwai
2016-10-20 14:17 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-10-20 14:35 ` Takashi Iwai
2016-10-20 14:34 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161020132055.9646-1-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noralf@tronnes.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome