From: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
To: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <joeyli.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acer-wmi: setup accelerometer when machine has appropriate notify event
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:28:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161101172851.GA4494@f23x64.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1477974812-12657-1-git-send-email-jlee@suse.com>
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 12:33:32PM +0800, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> The accelerometer event relies on on the ACERWMID_EVENT_GUID notify.
> So, this patch changes the codes to setup accelerometer input device
> when detected ACERWMID_EVENT_GUID. It avoids that the accel input
> device created on every acer machines.
>
> In addition, patch adds a clearly parsing logic of accelerometer hid
> to acer_wmi_get_handle_cb callback function. It is positive matching
> the "SENR" name with "BST0001" device to avoid non-supported hardware.
>
> Reported-by: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no>
> Tested-by: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no>
> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c
> index 79d64ea..3bb3162 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c
> @@ -1808,11 +1808,24 @@ static int __init acer_wmi_enable_lm(void)
> return status;
> }
>
> +#define ACER_WMID_ACCEL_HID "BST0001"
> +
> static acpi_status __init acer_wmi_get_handle_cb(acpi_handle ah, u32 level,
> void *ctx, void **retval)
> {
> + struct acpi_device *dev;
> +
> + if (strcmp(ctx, "SENR")) {
> + if (acpi_bus_get_device(ah, &dev))
> + return AE_OK;
> + if (!strcmp(ACER_WMID_ACCEL_HID, acpi_device_hid(dev)))
> + return AE_OK;
> + } else
> + return AE_OK;
> +
> *(acpi_handle *)retval = ah;
> - return AE_OK;
> +
> + return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
I don't understand this change. Previously, we assigned retval to ah and
returned AE_OK. Now, we either do not assign retval and still return AE_OK, or
we do assign it and then return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE....
I would have expected to see something more like:
if (we should setup the accelerometer)
reval = ah
return AE_OK
return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE
If I'm misunderstanding this, can you please try to explain - a comment in the
function would be useful.
Thanks,
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-01 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-01 4:33 Lee, Chun-Yi
2016-11-01 17:28 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2016-11-02 7:30 ` joeyli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-12 23:32 Lee, Chun-Yi
2016-08-29 10:00 Lee, Chun-Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161101172851.GA4494@f23x64.localdomain \
--to=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=joeyli.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®