Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: hugetlb: remove the wrong pmd check in find_num_contig()

[Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@arm.com>]

On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 06:16:16PM -0600, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:27:38AM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> > index 2e49bd2..4811ef1 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> > @@ -61,10 +61,6 @@ static int find_num_contig(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> >  		return 1;
> >  	}
> >  	pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> > -	if (!pmd_present(*pmd)) {
> > -		VM_BUG_ON(!pmd_present(*pmd));
> > -		return 1;
> > -	}
> >  	if ((pte_t *)pmd == ptep) {
> >  		*pgsize = PMD_SIZE;
> >  		return CONT_PMDS;
> 
> BTW, for the !pud_present() and !pgd_present() cases, shouldn't
The kernel will not call the find_num_contig() if the PGD/PUD are empty.
Please see the code in the hugetlb_fault().

   ------------------------------------------------------
	ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, address);
	if (ptep) {
	    ...............................
	} else {
		ptep = huge_pte_alloc(mm, address, huge_page_size(h));
		if (!ptep)
			return VM_FAULT_OOM;
	}
   ------------------------------------------------------


Thanks
Huang Shijie
> find_num_contig() actually return 0? These are more likely real bugs, so
> no point in setting the huge pte.