From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>,
Christophe Ricard <christophe.ricard@gmail.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: avoid warning for gpio hogging code
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 14:40:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161108134035.1764500-1-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
The newly added acpi_gpiochip_scan_gpios function produces a few harmless
warnings:
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c: In function ‘acpi_gpiochip_add’:
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c:925:7: error: ‘dflags’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c:925:9: error: ‘lflags’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
The problem is that he compiler cannot know that a negative return value
from fwnode_property_read_u32_array() or acpi_gpiochip_pin_to_gpio_offset()
implies that the IS_ERR(gpio_desc) is true, as the value could in theory
be below -MAX_ERRNO.
The function already initializes its output values to zero, and moving
that intialization a little higher up ensures that we can never have
uninitialized data in the caller.
Fixes: c80f1ba75df2 ("ACPI / gpio: Add hogging support")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
index 265e0fad518e..a3faefa44f68 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
@@ -869,6 +869,10 @@ static struct gpio_desc *acpi_gpiochip_parse_own_gpio(
u32 gpios[2];
int ret;
+ *lflags = 0;
+ *dflags = 0;
+ *name = NULL;
+
ret = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(fwnode, "gpios", gpios,
ARRAY_SIZE(gpios));
if (ret < 0)
@@ -882,10 +886,6 @@ static struct gpio_desc *acpi_gpiochip_parse_own_gpio(
if (IS_ERR(desc))
return desc;
- *lflags = 0;
- *dflags = 0;
- *name = NULL;
-
if (gpios[1])
*lflags |= GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;
--
2.9.0
next reply other threads:[~2016-11-08 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-08 13:40 Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-11-08 14:12 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-11-09 8:44 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161108134035.1764500-1-arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=christophe.ricard@gmail.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome