From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753665AbcKQCpF (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 21:45:05 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:57203 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751953AbcKQCpE (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 21:45:04 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 13:44:59 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with the block tree Message-ID: <20161117134459.20d1d87d@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: <20161109135414.283a9ac5@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Martin, On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:55:24 -0500 "Martin K. Petersen" wrote: > > In any case. It seems like the fact that the two SCSI trees may be out > of sync could be an ongoing problem. So maybe you should just drop my > tree again. I was just hoping to get visibility into potential merge > problems sooner... I'll keep it for now and see how it goes ... -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell