From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kdb: Call vkdb_printf() from vprintk_default() only when wanted
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:14:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161122121433.GC8220@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161023132343.GA466@swordfish>
On Sun 2016-10-23 22:23:43, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (10/21/16 14:50), Petr Mladek wrote:
> [..]
> > diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > index d5e397315473..db73e33811e7 100644
> > --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > @@ -1941,7 +1941,9 @@ int vprintk_default(const char *fmt, va_list args)
> > int r;
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_KGDB_KDB
> > - if (unlikely(kdb_trap_printk)) {
> > + /* Allow to pass printk() to kdb but avoid a recursion. */
> > + if (unlikely(kdb_trap_printk &&
> > + kdb_printf_cpu != smp_processor_id())) {
> ^^^^^
> aren't we are in preemptible here?
Yeah, I looked on this from one side only. "kdb_printf_cpu" is set
with disabled IRQs. Therefore the preemption is disabled if we
are in the recursion scenario. But you are right that we might
get a false positive if we are preempted in the middle of this check
and later scheduled on the CPU that called kdb_vprintf before.
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-22 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-21 12:50 [PATCH 0/2] kdb: Fix locking in vkdb_printf() Petr Mladek
2016-10-21 12:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] kdb: Properly synchronize vkdb_printf() calls with other CPUs Petr Mladek
2016-11-07 10:07 ` Daniel Thompson
2016-11-22 10:34 ` Petr Mladek
2016-10-21 12:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] kdb: Call vkdb_printf() from vprintk_default() only when wanted Petr Mladek
2016-10-23 13:23 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-11-22 12:14 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2016-11-07 10:24 ` Daniel Thompson
2016-11-22 12:45 ` Petr Mladek
2016-11-22 14:32 ` Daniel Thompson
2016-11-23 16:29 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161122121433.GC8220@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome