From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755428AbcKVM1u (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:27:50 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:55846 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752299AbcKVM1t (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:27:49 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:27:41 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: prahlad venkata Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vignesh R Message-ID: <20161122122741.vo5e6udfkda5ke5d@sirena.org.uk> References: <20161115182643.32217-1-prahlad.eee@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="djceyviq6yiryzmu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: rugged, adj.: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161014 (1.7.1) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:470:1f1d:6b5::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: reinit of completion variable X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk); Unknown failure Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --djceyviq6yiryzmu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:54:06PM +0530, prahlad venkata wrote: > Did anybody got chance to review this patch? > I feel this is a trivial yet required fix. Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so=20 on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway, though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled. Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context. This allows readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the discussion is being addressed. --djceyviq6yiryzmu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAABCAAGBQJYNDm8AAoJECTWi3JdVIfQ/1gH/0Pye1u3TnYYwDrU7S8EGwHB BlHW41AFtp+h10YNIlR/zqjdJv3FSbSykQVJ+CPsPwhqXPim3gn1XkhooTC17rDZ Pkq8RyA1op8DMS5sGKCUA31qJtaapfBC4AhobA8h3oNIz1vnF0bIT0GElnFckwvG I/uTNdTT2K2eUjjbtLM3Vzto8HoJKFwIXCgXSj0sDgFiwOp+d4ScSvi+tGr+siyQ RCQ9NlbbmE/8WaVkm7l6mB9vvDxecvvuez+x3KmWCxfAlsdtRQJmZX7VeBmSmeP1 VpMM7666Q1PKONzi/GgdKhQrmS5R2rcn/YNMvW/xe6uKtSpH2xbFbWfb1K4eMrg= =jkvX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --djceyviq6yiryzmu--