From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S932629AbcK2Vv0 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:51:26 -0500
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:42486 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1753631AbcK2Vup (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:50:45 -0500
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 13:50:12 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ying Huang <ying.huang@intel.com>, dave.hansen@intel.com,
        ak@linux.intel.com, aaron.lu@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
        Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] mm/swap: Regular page swap optimizations
Message-Id: <20161129135012.ec4f6fd238022b76943e9f43@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <1480367641.3064.33.camel@linux.intel.com>
References: <cover.1479252493.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
        <1480367641.3064.33.camel@linux.intel.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:14:01 -0800 Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 15:47 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> > Andrew,
> > 
> > It seems like there are no objections to this patch series so far.
> > Can you help us get this patch series to be code reviewed in more__
> > depth so it can be considered for inclusion to 4.10?
> > Will appreciate if Mel, Johannes, Rik or others can take a look.
> 
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Want to give you a ping to see if you can consider merging this series,
> as there are no objections from anyone since its posting 2 weeks ago?

Well, you did say "for 4.10", with which I agree.  So I have them
buffered for processing around the 4.10-rc1 timeframe.