From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751792AbcLCV5O (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Dec 2016 16:57:14 -0500 Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:34138 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751154AbcLCV5L (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Dec 2016 16:57:11 -0500 Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 16:56:31 -0500 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Richard Weinberger Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, david@sigma-star.at, dedekind1@gmail.com, ebiggers@google.com, mhalcrow@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org, dengler@linutronix.de, sbabic@denx.de, wd@denx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] UBIFS related fscrypt updates Message-ID: <20161203215631.vcmmlr4g5foo4bf7@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , Richard Weinberger , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, david@sigma-star.at, dedekind1@gmail.com, ebiggers@google.com, mhalcrow@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org, dengler@linutronix.de, sbabic@denx.de, wd@denx.de References: <1480630498-19201-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1480630498-19201-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161104 (1.7.1) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:14:52PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > This series applies on top of Ted's fscrypt tree[0] addresses the review > comments from Eric. > Ted, it would be awesome to have this patches in the v4.10 merge window. Your patch 4/6 won't apply on my branch because it references fs/ubifs/crypto.c (which of course isn't in my tree). I could drop it, but I want to make sure you then make the appropriate changes in your tree. Also, I think Eric Bigger's changes make sense. As far as whether or not they make it for the 4.10 merge window. Linus could be opening the merge window tomorrow, so it's getting a bit late for that.... if he decides to do a -rc8, we could probably do it. - Ted