From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: kan.liang@intel.com
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
namhyung@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
wangnan0@huawei.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, andi@firstfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 04/13] perf/core: output multiplexing overhead
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:23:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161206112330.GL3124@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480713561-6617-5-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 04:19:12PM -0500, kan.liang@intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
>
> Multiplexing overhead is one of the key overhead when the number of
> events is more than available counters.
>
> The multiplexing overhead PERF_CORE_MUX_OVERHEAD is a common overhead
> type.
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> index fe7b1fb..355086f 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -999,6 +999,7 @@ struct perf_branch_entry {
> */
> enum perf_record_overhead_type {
> PERF_CORE_OVERHEAD = 0,
> + PERF_CORE_MUX_OVERHEAD = 0,
'0' already had a name ?!
>
> PERF_PMU_OVERHEAD = 20,
> PERF_PMU_SAMPLE_OVERHEAD = 20,
Same here I suppose, why are there two with the same name?
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 306bc92..025a19d 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -1830,6 +1830,9 @@ event_sched_out(struct perf_event *event,
> if (event->attr.exclusive || !cpuctx->active_oncpu)
> cpuctx->exclusive = 0;
>
> + if (log_overhead && cpuctx->mux_overhead.nr)
> + perf_log_overhead(event, PERF_CORE_MUX_OVERHEAD, &cpuctx->mux_overhead);
> +
This isn't mentioned in the Changelog. Why is it here?
> perf_pmu_enable(event->pmu);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-06 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-02 21:19 [PATCH V2 00/13] export perf overheads information kan.liang
2016-12-02 21:19 ` [PATCH V2 01/13] perf/core: Introduce PERF_RECORD_OVERHEAD kan.liang
2016-12-06 11:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-02 21:19 ` [PATCH V2 02/13] perf/core: output overhead when sched out from context kan.liang
2016-12-06 11:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-02 21:19 ` [PATCH V2 03/13] perf/x86: output sampling overhead kan.liang
2016-12-06 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-06 15:02 ` Liang, Kan
2016-12-06 15:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-06 15:47 ` Liang, Kan
2016-12-06 18:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-07 19:03 ` Liang, Kan
2016-12-06 11:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-02 21:19 ` [PATCH V2 04/13] perf/core: output multiplexing overhead kan.liang
2016-12-06 11:23 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-12-06 15:04 ` Liang, Kan
2016-12-02 21:19 ` [PATCH V2 05/13] perf/core: output side-band events overhead kan.liang
2016-12-06 11:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-02 21:19 ` [PATCH V2 06/13] perf tools: option to disable overhead collection kan.liang
2016-12-02 21:19 ` [PATCH V2 07/13] perf tools: handle PERF_RECORD_OVERHEAD record type kan.liang
2016-12-06 11:16 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-12-02 21:19 ` [PATCH V2 08/13] perf tools: show kernel overhead kan.liang
2016-12-06 11:16 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-12-06 11:16 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-12-06 11:16 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-12-02 21:19 ` [PATCH V2 09/13] perf script: " kan.liang
2016-12-04 21:25 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-12-05 14:47 ` Liang, Kan
2016-12-02 21:19 ` [PATCH V2 10/13] perf tools: add time related functions kan.liang
2016-12-06 11:16 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-12-02 21:19 ` [PATCH V2 11/13] perf tools: introduce PERF_RECORD_USER_OVERHEAD kan.liang
2016-12-02 21:19 ` [PATCH V2 12/13] perf tools: record user space profiling cost kan.liang
2016-12-02 21:19 ` [PATCH V2 13/13] perf report: warn on high overhead kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161206112330.GL3124@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome