From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932658AbcLINk3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2016 08:40:29 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:36262 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753219AbcLINk2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2016 08:40:28 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 14:40:25 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Gerhard Wiesinger Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Still OOM problems with 4.9er kernels Message-ID: <20161209134025.GB4342@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri 09-12-16 08:06:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote: > Hello, > > same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes > better). > > ./update.sh: line 40: 1591 Killed ${EXE} update ${PARAMS} > (does dnf clean all;dnf update) > Linux database.intern 4.9.0-0.rc8.git2.1.fc26.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Dec 7 > 17:53:29 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > Updated bug report: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314697 Could you post your oom report please? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs