From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, juri.lelli@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
xlpang@redhat.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
jdesfossez@efficios.com, bristot@redhat.com,
dvhart@infradead.org, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH -v4 04/10] futex: Use smp_store_release() in mark_wake_futex()
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 09:36:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161213085730.289714424@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161213083638.938898295@infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: peterz-futex-mark_wake_futex.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 697 bytes --]
Since the futex_q can dissapear the instruction after assigning NULL,
this really should be a RELEASE barrier. That stops loads from hitting
dead memory too.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/futex.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1288,8 +1288,7 @@ static void mark_wake_futex(struct wake_
* memory barrier is required here to prevent the following
* store to lock_ptr from getting ahead of the plist_del.
*/
- smp_wmb();
- q->lock_ptr = NULL;
+ smp_store_release(&q->lock_ptr, NULL);
}
static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_q *top_waiter,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-13 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-13 8:36 [PATCH -v4 00/10] FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI wobbles Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-13 8:36 ` [PATCH -v4 01/10] futex: Fix potential use-after-free in FUTEX_REQUEUE_PI Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-16 23:58 ` Darren Hart
2016-12-13 8:36 ` [PATCH -v4 02/10] futex: Add missing error handling to FUTEX_REQUEUE_PI Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-17 0:06 ` Darren Hart
2016-12-17 13:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-18 23:31 ` Darren Hart
2016-12-13 8:36 ` [PATCH -v4 03/10] futex: Cleanup variable names for futex_top_waiter() Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-17 0:13 ` Darren Hart
2017-02-22 14:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-13 8:36 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-12-17 0:50 ` [PATCH -v4 04/10] futex: Use smp_store_release() in mark_wake_futex() Darren Hart
2017-02-22 14:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-17 0:35 ` Darren Hart
2016-12-13 8:36 ` [PATCH -v4 05/10] futex: Remove rt_mutex_deadlock_account_*() Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-13 8:36 ` [PATCH -v4 06/10] futex,rt_mutex: Provide futex specific rt_mutex API Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-13 8:36 ` [PATCH -v4 07/10] futex: Change locking Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-13 8:36 ` [PATCH -v4 08/10] futex: Rework futex_lock_pi() vs rt_mutex_timed_futex_lock() Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-13 8:36 ` [PATCH -v4 09/10] futex: Remove inconsistent hb/rt_mutex state magic Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-13 8:36 ` [PATCH -v4 10/10] futex: Pull rt_mutex_futex_unlock() out from under hb->lock Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-13 16:07 ` [PATCH -v4 00/10] FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI wobbles Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-22 11:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-02-22 15:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-01 9:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-03 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-16 23:31 ` Darren Hart
2016-12-17 13:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-18 22:39 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161213085730.289714424@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=jdesfossez@efficios.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®